[Trisquel-devel] New bugtracker workflow proposal

Michał Masłowski mtjm at mtjm.eu
Fri Mar 6 19:48:48 CET 2015


> http://trisquel.info/en/wiki/bugtracker-proposal

> Any comments/feedback ?

I have several questions:

- "User support: Bugs that can doesn't need any code change, only user
  configuration/guide": should be "bugs that don't need", or are bugs
  that possibly need changes also there?

- I assume it will be obvious for users that packages in default install
  aren't in the "Packages" component.

- Do Upstream issues have this workflow: New -> Confirmed (after next
  release) -> Closed?

- Branding bugs that affect FSDG-compliance or that cause trademark
  license violations have higher priority?  None of the priority
  descriptions apply to FSDG-related bugs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listas.trisquel.info/pipermail/trisquel-devel/attachments/20150306/0423c304/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Trisquel-devel mailing list