[Trisquel-users] suggestions for trisquel mini

Brian Churchwell bchurchwell at gmail.com
Wed Mar 3 19:12:11 CET 2010

2010/3/3 Rubén Rodríguez Pérez <ruben at trisquel.info>:

> You are all invited to start expanding this page with pros and cons for
> every entry. You should always take in consideration this ideas:
> - Only programs already in the repository are usable. We will not
> import new software for this kind of job.
> - The most used program is most likely the better choice
> - Translations are very important
> - We will only include GTK+ apps
> - Low memory usage is more important than file size
> - We would like to keep the image below the 400MB mark, to allow it to
> be used in 512mb usb thumb drives with some space for persistence data.
> - Usability is a strong requirement. All programs must be easy to use.
> - A known old program is often better than a cool new one.
> - The bleeding edge is not important, we aim to small computers.

I couldn't agree more with this philosophy, and I really appreciate
this concise explanation.

If there is a similar philosophy statement for Trisquel in general
please point me and others to it.  It will answer a lot of questions
posted to the list.

My suggestion is to get the netinst image working so that any user can
then make a fully free system however they want- server, mini,
desktop, etc.  It might be better to spend time making it easier for
people to make Trisquel into whatever they want rather than going back
and forth on defaults for different versions.


More information about the Trisquel-users mailing list