From ark at switnet.org Tue Jul 1 05:48:13 2025 From: ark at switnet.org (Luis Guzman) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:48:13 -0600 Subject: [Trisquel-devel] [Testing] Abrowser 140 In-Reply-To: <47b129749f15410a77845222070ba01c1dab5faa.camel@metani.fr> References: <47d52625-5356-4c1b-96ae-60ee23fdc779@switnet.org> <47b129749f15410a77845222070ba01c1dab5faa.camel@metani.fr> Message-ID: <8c19a8d5-29e2-40cf-9f26-fce855b5725e@switnet.org> En 30/06/25 02:05, David Lecompte escribi?: > I had to enable the testing repository for ecne to have Abrowser 140, but I > just did a fresh install of ecne in a vm from the latest netinstaller and it > is Abrowser 140. Was it moved to the main repository already? Yeah, after I had the jitsi meet issue, I did spend some time testing regular use cases, and checking some details on the release, and nothing seemed that was an anti-feature so far. If for whatever reason there is plenty of feedback we can hold it longer for review, otherwise waiting one week for some report sounds about right before moving on. Remember that Abrowser is under the rapid release, which mean a release almost monthly, we might need to come up with some routines to review effectively and efficiently for changes that might come up and be an issue to? the community at large. Anyone has ideas on the subject? Regards -- Luis A. Guzm?n G. http://ark.switnet.org Capitulo Mexicano de Software Libre - https://cmxsl.org Software Libre con ra?z ?tica, acci?n local y visi?n nacional. Por tu propio bien, y en solidaridad a todos, elige la libertad. ?S? Libre! - https://fsfla.org/selibre/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0x35AD8DB3BE2C988C.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 7193 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: