[Trisquel-devel] abrowser addons was Re: Packaged Youtube ALL HTML5

[laigualdad]

Hi thanks, not sure what to name this thread now. I'll be sure to avoid
starting a new thread by replying to the list.

Oh dear god I don't know what happened to that paste. The link seems to
have stopped working (the host may have deleted it!!!), although it was
supposed to have stayed active for 30 days. I should have saved a local
copy... What a pity. Not using hastebin anymore!!! (If anyone saved a
copy, let me know)

At least I have some sense of which extensions they were. It won't be
hard to add them. Working on it now.


On 04/13/2014 08:58 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote:
> From: laigualdad <laigualdad at riseup.net>
> Subject: Re: [Trisquel-devel] abrowser addons
> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:53:22 -0500
>
>> I scouted out a bunch of freedom friendly addons (judged based on the
>> licenses) we can add to Abrowser. If you give me the permission, I will
>> add them to the list.
>>
>> http://hastebin.com/dupowiwaxu.avrasm
>>
>> Note: Although there is an entry on the abrowser addons index,
>> Firegloves is unfortunately no longer available on the Mozilla addon
>> site (404).
>>
>>
>> On 04/13/2014 01:31 PM, Andrew Lindley wrote:
>>> From: Rubén Rodríguez <ruben at gnu.org>
> [Thread jacked stuff removed]
>
> Firstly, well done for doing the research and being willing to do more.
>
> AFAIK the only person who can give permission for anything Trisquel is
> Rubén.  However, as on the RH pane of the Trisquel.info site when
> you're logged in there's an entry Create Content with a sub-entry
> Add-On available to all users, then it doesn't look like you need
> permission in the first place.
>
> The English page it links to [1] has a number fields, like a combo box
> of approved licenses, description and several URLs for use in the
> Add-on entry.  If you want some QA, then prep your entries in a self
> explanatory text file (unbroken URLs) and post them here with a long
> post warning in the subject.  I for one will do some checking as and
> when I'm well enough (I'm disabled).  But, best post here rather than
> send directly so others might pick it up if I'm not.
>
> While there's no 'use netiquette' rules posted for trisquel-dev and
> I'm not in a position to make policy please from a practical point of
> view do not in future top post to an extant bottom posted thread.  In
> this case it didn't matter, but in an ongoing discussion it will
> rapidly mean no one can follow the flow of conversation in later quoting.
>
> Lastly well done for doing the research and being will to do more again.
>
> Leny
>
> [1] https://trisquel.info/en/node/add/addon
> _______________________________________________
> Trisquel-devel mailing list
> Trisquel-devel at listas.trisquel.info
> http://listas.trisquel.info/mailman/listinfo/trisquel-devel
>